Quantcast
Jul
02

No, I’m from Canada

We live in a broken world. Everywhere you turn, you see the impact of sin. But why? Why did sin spread from Adam and Eve to all people? In the last post, we explored the possibility that sin spreads everywhere because we spread it. We don’t want to admit it, but we’re our own worst enemies.

In this post, I’d like to look in a different direction. Maybe sin spread to everyone because we’re all in this together.

Paul describes us all as being “in Adam” (1 Cor 15:22). When Adam rejected God’s plan and destroyed shalom, we all fell right along with him. Elsewhere he says it like this, “Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned” (Rom 5:12). So Adam and Eve were kicked out of the Garden, forced to live east of Eden instead. Consequently, everyone who has come after them has been born east of Eden as well—separated from God, cut off from the source of life, dead in our sins (Eph 2:1; Col 1:2).  We all fell together.

Now, I can almost hear the objections forming in your mind. They’re in mine as well. How can this be fair? We didn’t choose to break that commandment. Why are we being punished?

The simplest answer is to point out that although we didn’t break that commandment, we’ve broken plenty since. Just like Adam and Eve, we’ve made our own choices—deciding to focus on our own plans and desires, rather than pursuing and manifesting God’s glory in the world. So, even if we set aside Adam and Eve’s sin, we’re far from blameless.

But there’s a deeper answer as well. From the Bible’s perspective, we’re all in this together.

When I lived in Scotland, I learned a couple of interesting facts. First, it’s sometimes a bit awkward to be American in a place where American policies are not terribly popular. And second, Canadians do not like it when people think they they’re American.

The first point became clear because we lived in Scotland during the Bush/Kerry election, a time when Scottish frustration with the war in Iraq was high. So American politics and policies were on everyone’s mind. And people quickly noticed that I was American. You’d think it would be hard to pick out the American in a room full of Scots. But apparently it’s not. Several times complete strangers walked up and asked me about how I was going to vote in the upcoming election and whether I supported the war. On two different occasions, I got trapped in pretty intense political “conversations”—i.e., the other person vented about the evils of American foreign policy while I scanned the room for a window large enough for both me and my backpack.

Was it fair for these people to associate me with the actions and policies of my country? After all, I didn’t create any of these policies, and I certainly wasn’t involved in any of those actions. I’ve never even been to Iraq. None of this was my fault. I wasn’t responsible.

But I was.

I wasn’t directly responsible, of course. It’s not like I was in the Oval Office making the decisions. But I am an American. I am a part of the whole. I enjoy the many blessings that come from being a part of that whole, and I also bear some responsibility for the actions of the whole. Even if I thought that a particular decision or action was a bad idea, even if I voted against those who were making the decisions, I’m still a part of that greater whole that we call America. Consequently, I bear some responsibility for what America does. And I certainly share in any consequences that result. I may not always like it, but there is a real sense in which we’re all in this together.

All of this can be really annoying if you’re Canadian. The second thing I learned in Scotland is that although Europeans have an easy time identifying if you’re American, they have a hard time telling Americans and Canadians apart. So, if you’re Canadian, people tend just to assume that you’re American. And then you have to put up with all the grief that being American can bring where American policies are unpopular.

Of course, Canadians have an advantage. They can simply point out that they’re not American. People apologize, and the harassment ends.

Eyeing a window that is clearly too small for both me and my backpack, I consider taking the cheap way out. “Me? No, I’m from Canada.”

But, of course, I’m not. I’m American. And, although I like being American, it does come with some drawbacks at times. Because we’re all in this together.

All of this is part of what makes the story of the Fall so tragic. It’s not just a story about two people, the decision they made, and the horrible consequences they experienced as a result. More fundamentally, it’s a story about what happens when God’s people turn away from their God-given purpose and focus instead on their own plans, their own desires, their own glory. It’s a story about what happens when God’s people and God’s creation become separated from God himself, the source of life. It’s a story of death, guilt, shame, and alienation. It’s a story about life after the shattering of shalom, east of Eden.

[This is an excerpt from a book that I'm writing about the gospel, Good News for the Living Dead: A Fresh Take on the Gospel Story. You can read the other excerpts and keep track of new ones as they become available on my blog.]

About Marc Cortez

Theology Prof and Dean at Western Seminary, husband, father, & blogger, who loves theology, church history, ministry, pop culture, books, and life in general.

Comments

  1. Rick says:

    “All of this is part of what makes the story of the Fall so tragic. It’s not just a story about two people, the decision they made, and the horrible consequences they experienced as a result. More fundamentally, it’s a story about what happens when God’s people turn away from their God-given purpose and focus instead on their own plans, their own desires, their own glory. It’s a story about what happens when God’s people and God’s creation become separated from God himself, the source of life. It’s a story of death, guilt, shame, and alienation. It’s a story about life after the shattering of shalom, east of Eden.”

    That’s good.

  2. WOW! Are you ever way off base! We DO NOT SPREAD SIN culturally, familially, or through any other progressive means. Sin is spread from simply being born. Not one totally human birth ever produced a sin free baby. NOT EVER. We are born IN sin and OF sin and we are BORN sinners. Period. I suggest that you read up on it.

    • Rick says:

      Cheryl …. what a relief ….. boy I thought I was the only one on line who was ever snarky! I’m not sure that your take on Marc’s post is accurately reflected in your comment however. I’m pretty sure that Marc’s post agrees with you that we are born in sin and are all sinners from birth even before we commit an act of sin. And as a theology prof at a seminary, though I don’t agree with his take on every aspect of theology, I’m pretty certain his take on original sin is on target.

    • Marc Cortez says:

      Cheryl, thanks for the comment. But I have to wonder if you only read my first post and not this one. Either that, or I wasn’t as clear as I’d hoped to be. Between the two posts, I suggested two different ways of understanding why sin is universal. And I think they’re both biblical and necessary ways of understanding sin. The first focused on the things that we do. And I stand by the idea that we “spread” sin through everything that we do. But the second landed pretty solidly on exactly what you’re suggesting: all people are sinful simply by virtue of being born into a sinful condition. I don’t disagree at all with that. I’m saying that we are born into sin and that we spread sin through our actions. It’s not an either/or.

  3. Ron Swaren says:

    I wonder if Adam and Eve lived in that part of the Persian Gulf that got flooded out at the end of the last Ice Age? From previously living a life of leisure eating shellfish, pomegranates and swimming in the lagoons, they had to run off to the mountains and dig for worms. Probably, someone already owned the real estate there, , too. No wonder they felt kicked out of paradise:

    http://phys.org/news/2010-12-lost-civilization-persian-gulf.html
    “In recent years, archaeologists have turned up evidence of a wave of human settlements along the shores of the Gulf dating to about 7,500 years ago. “Where before there had been but a handful of scattered hunting camps, suddenly, over 60 new archaeological sites appear virtually overnight,” Rose said. “These settlements boast well-built, permanent stone houses, long-distance trade networks, elaborately decorated pottery, domesticated animals, and even evidence for one of the oldest boats in the world.”

    But how could such highly developed settlements pop up so quickly, with no precursor populations to be found in the archaeological record? Rose believes that evidence of those preceding populations is missing because it’s under the Gulf.

    “Perhaps it is no coincidence that the founding of such remarkably well developed communities along the shoreline corresponds with the flooding of the Persian Gulf basin around 8,000 years ago,” Rose said. “These new colonists may have come from the heart of the Gulf, displaced by rising water levels that plunged the once fertile landscape beneath the waters of the Indian Ocean.”

Speak Your Mind

*